Princípios de design e Role-Playing Games para análises ex-ante de políticas públicas: O caso da Política Nacional de Proteção ao Ambiente Escolar
Design and Role-Playing Games principles for ex-ante analyses of public policies: The case of the National School Environment Protection Policy
Rafael Tavares Schleicher, Rodrigo Mota Narcizo
Resumo
O ensaio discute o uso de técnicas de gamificação para análises ex-ante de políticas públicas. Concentrando-se principalmente nas lições aprendidas com jogos de RPG tradicionais e de tabuleiro, bem como nos princípios de design de jogos eletrônicos, discute-se o caso da Política Nacional de Proteção do Ambiente Escolar (Decreto 11/469, de 5 de abril de 2023). Utilizando a metodologia de estudo de caso e revisando a literatura disponível sobre o tema, o artigo apresenta uma aplicação prática de técnicas de gamificação para orientar um processo participativo de três meses de duração, que incluiu as fases de design, análise e relatoria. Intitulado “Método de Design de RPG de Tabuleiro para Análise Ex-Ante”, o método possui quinze etapas, que são devidamente exploradas no contexto da Política Nacional de Proteção do Ambiente Escolar ao longo do artigo. Como considerações finais, apresenta-se uma reflexão sobre a pertinência da expansão massiva de métodos de avaliação baseados em estratégias de gamificação online no Brasil.
Palavras-chave
Abstract
The essay revolves around the use of gamification techniques for ex-ante analysis of public policies. Focusing primarily on lessons from traditional and board-based role-playing games, as well as principles of electronic game design, it discusses the case of the National Policy for the Protection of the School Environment (Decree 11/469, of April 5, 2023). Using a case study methodology and reviewing the available literature on the subject, the article presents a practical application of gamification techniques to guide the three-month long participatory process, which included design, analysis, and reporting phases. Entitled “Board-Based RPG Design Method for Ex-Ante Analysis,” the method has fifteen steps, which are duly explored within the context of the National Policy for the Protection of the School Environment throughout the article. As final remarks, a reflection on the appropriateness of massively expanding evaluation methods based on online gamification strategies in Brazil is presented.
Keywords
References
Adachi, Paul, & Willoughby, Teena. (2011). The effect of video game competition and violence on aggressive behavior: Which characteristic has the greatest influence? Psychology of Violence, 1(4), 259-274. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024908
Alkin, M. C., & Christie, Christina. (2002). The use of role-play in teaching evaluation. The American Journal of Evaluation, 23(2), 209-218. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821400202300210
Barton, Marvin, & Stacks, Shane. (2019). Dungeons and desktops: The history of computer role-playing games (2nd ed.). Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Bowman, Sarah. (2010). The functions of role-playing games: How participants create community, solve problems and explore identity. Jefferson: McFarland & Company.
Brasil. (2018). Avaliação de politicas públicas: Guia prático de análise ex ante. Brasília: Ipea.
Brasil. (2024). Institui o Sistema Nacional de Acompanhamento e Combate à Violência nas Escolas e regulamenta a Lei nº 14.643, de 2 de agosto de 2023 (Decreto nº 12.006, de 24 de abril de 2024). Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília. Recuperado em 24 de julho de 2025, de https://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2023-2026/2024/decreto/d12006.htm
Brasil. (2025a). GTI de combate à violência nas escolas apresenta relatório. Brasília. Recuperado em 24 de julho de 2025, de https://www.gov.br/mec/pt-br/assuntos/noticias/2023/outubro/gti-de-combate-aviolencia-nas-escolas-apresenta-relatorio
Brasil. (2025b). Conheça ações do MEC para promover a segurança nas escolas. Brasília. Recuperado em 24 de julho de 2025, de https://agenciagov.ebc.com.br/noticias/202410/conheca-acoes-do-mec-parapromover-a-seguranca-nas-escolas.
Castel, Alan, Pratt, Jay, & Drummond, Emily. (2005). The effects of action video game experience on the time course of inhibition of return and the efficiency of visual search. Acta Psychologica, 119(2), 217-230. PMid:15877981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2005.02.004
Cole, Helena, & Griffiths, Mark. (2007). Social interactions in massively multiplayer online role-playing gamers. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10(4), 575-583. PMid:17711367. https://doi.org/10.1089/ cpb.2007.9988
Cover, Jennifer. (2010). The creation of narrative in tabletop role-playing games. Jefferson: McFarland & Company.
Cunha, Jasafá. (2023). Características, fatores associados e prevenção da violência escolar: Uma revisão rápida de revisões sistemáticas. Brasília: ENAP.
Doberstein, Carey. (2020). Role-playing in public engagement for housing for vulnerable populations: An experiment exploring its possibilities and limitations. Land Use Policy, 99, 105032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. landusepol.2020.105032
Febey, Karen, & Coyne, Molly. (2007). Program evaluation. The board game: An interactive learning tool for evaluators. The American Journal of Evaluation, 28(1), 91-101. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214006296567
Gentile, Douglas, Anderson, Craig, Yukawa, Shintaro, Ihori, Nobuko, Saleem, Muniba, Ming, Lim, Shibuya, Akiko, Liau, Albert, Khoo, Angeline, Bushman, Brad, Huesmann, Rowell, & Sakamoto, Akira. (2009). The effects of prosocial video games on prosocial behaviors: International evidence from correlational, longitudinal, and experimental studies. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(6), 752-763. PMid:19321812. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209333045
Kühn, Simone, Gleich, Tobias, Lorenz, Robert, Lindenberger, Ulman, & Gallinat, Jürgen. (2014). Playing Super Mario induces structural brain plasticity: Gray matter changes resulting from training with a commercial video game. Molecular Psychiatry, 19(2), 265-271. PMid:24166407. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2013.120
Masser, Kai, & Mory, Linda. (2018). The gamification of citizens’ participation in policymaking. Cham: Springer.
Mizer, Nicholas. (2019). Tabletop role-playing games and the experience of imagined worlds. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-29127-3
Mora, Alberto, Riera, Daniel, González, Carina, & Arnedo-Moreno, Joan. (2017). Gamification: A systematic review of design frameworks. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(3), 516-548. https://doi. org/10.1007/s12528-017-9150-4
Moser, Christopher, & Fang, Xiaowen. (2014). Narrative control and player experience in role playing games. decision points and branching narrative feedback. In Masaaki Kurosu (Ed.), Human-computer interaction: Applications and services (pp. 622-633). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07227-2_59
Olejniczak, Karol. (2017). The game of knowledge brokering: A new method for increasing evaluation use. The American Journal of Evaluation, 38(4), 554-576. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214017716326
Olejniczak, Karol, Newcomer, Kathryn, & Meijer, Sebastiaan. (2020). Advancing evaluation practice with serious games. The American Journal of Evaluation, 41(3), 339-366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214020905897
Perrotton, Arthur, De Garine-Wichatitsky, Michel, Valls-Fox, Hugo, & Le Page, Christophe. (2017). My cattle and your park: Codesigning a role-playing game with rural communities to promote multistakeholder dialogue at the edge of protected areas. Ecology and Society, 22(1), art35. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES08962-220135
Richter, Ganit, Raban, Daphne, & Rafaeli, Sheizaf. (2015). Studying gamification: The effect of rewards and incentives on motivation. In Torsten Reiners & Lincoln Wood (Eds.), Gamification in education and business (pp. 21-46). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10208-5_2
Robson, Karen, Plangger, Kirk, Kietzmann, Jan, McCarthy, Ian, & Pitt, Leyland. (2015). Is it all a game? Understanding the principles of gamification. Business Horizons, 58(4), 411-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. bushor.2015.03.006
Routledge, Helen. (2016). Why games are good for business: How to leverage the power of serious games, gamification and simulations. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137448989
Souchère, Véronique, Millair, Laurent, Echeverria, Javier, Bousquet, François, Le Page, Christophe, & Etienne, Michel. (2010). Co-constructing with stakeholders a role-playing game to initiate collective management of erosive runoff risks at the watershed scale. Environmental Modelling & Software, 25(11), 1359-1370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.03.002
Stieglitz, Stefan, Lattemann, Christoph, Robra-Bissantz, Susanne, Zarnekow, Rüdiger, & Brockmann, Tobias (Eds.). (2017). Gamification. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45557-0
Taylor, Holly, Renshaw, Carl, & Jensen, Michael. (1997). Effects of computer-based role-playing on decision making skills. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 17(2), 147-164. https://doi.org/10.2190/Y1CXXU4G-KDFK-JBFJ
van Roy, Rob, & Zaman, Bieke. (2019). Unravelling the ambivalent motivational power of gamification: A basic psychological needs perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 127, 38-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2018.04.009
Wouters, Pieter, van der Spek, Erik, & van Oostendorp, Herre. (2009). A review from a learning outcomes perspective. In Thomas Connolly, Mark Stansfield & Liz Boyle (Eds.), Games-based learning advancements
Submitted date:
07/28/2025
Accepted date:
02/25/2025
Facebook
LinkedIn
Mendeley
Reddit
Email